A National Court judge has argued that it is "full justification" that the security forces give a tip of an armed gang, a behavior that seems to engage strongly in type 'collaboration with an armed group', being in the framework "A process of political negotiation or a peace process" *. Has argued, therefore, quite naturally, that the application of the Penal Code may be subject to a political decision.
That a judge of the Audiencia Nacional paste is allowed to kick the rule of law, with an ease that shows that not even felt the need to hide, should sound alarms. There appears to be happening on a large scale, and it seems to detect the operation of a peculiar mechanism: we understand the seriousness of the matter, but we are unable to do anything to avoid it. So she starts a dissonance that, like all others, triggers an automatic process of adjustment. And since we can not resolve the issue, we are convinced that it is irrelevant. By the way, we began to look with antipathy for those that are alarmed or report the incident, because we have a disturbing example. Over time, the mechanism generates a sort of label to the effect that, in politics, sweating is bad taste, and one who is agitated is viewed with disdain and suspicion. This explains, incidentally, how easy it is to make it 'crispador'. Yesterday was
Palma Rosa Díez featuring UPyD candidates for regional and local elections next May. A diagnosis of the parlous state of the patient Spain, and made a series of therapeutic measures to avoid death. Impeccably reasonable measures, which, I suspect, would be shared by a large majority of the English. But the problem is the complexity of diagnosis, but the doctors that will probably have to apply the therapy: the PP and PSOE **. The fact is that the major parties are unwilling to alter an ecosystem in which they live nicely, so once again, will refrain from taking measures that voters would applaud. However, they continue votándolos. Partly by considerations about the utility of their vote. In part, I fear, for reasons as described in the first paragraph of this post.
This was the approach of Rosa Diez: the two major parties have become gigantic pachyderms that close, with rear access to any alternative, and thus prevent the implementation of necessary therapies, which are essential for patient but painful for them. The voter is thus limited by a dramatic disjunctive: either vote for this, not quite like me or the other, which strongly repels me. UPyD, in the words of Rosa Díez, intends to introduce, between the two mammoth "o's" modest "and". Something that the pachyderms are nervous because nobody likes to see hanging around a coordinating conjunction near his buttocks. That helps explain the media blackout, so fair, have dedicated. ___________________
* I've seen things that others do not soñaríais . It is clear that the poor never crossed Roy Batty Zapatero's Spain. **
even remotely pretend equidistant between the two parties. The problem has been created by the PSOE Zapatero. But I think, since 2008, Rajoy has resigned to battle.
0 comments:
Post a Comment